home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1988-04-08 | 20.1 KB | 586 lines | [TEXT/ttxt] |
- 8-Jun-87 11:49:37-PDT,21083;000000000001
- Return-Path: <delphi-mac-request@RELAY.CS.NET>
- Received: from RELAY.CS.NET by SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU with TCP; Mon, 8 Jun 87 11:48:49 PDT
- Received: from relay2.cs.net by RELAY.CS.NET id aa26370; 8 Jun 87 13:48 EDT
- Received: from relay.cs.net by RELAY.CS.NET id aa23480; 8 Jun 87 13:41 EDT
- Received: from sdr.slb.com by RELAY.CS.NET id af23449; 8 Jun 87 13:38 EDT
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 87 13:23 EDT
- From: Jeffrey Shulman <SHULMAN%sdr.slb.com@RELAY.CS.NET>
- Subject: Delphi Mac Digest V3 #30
- To: delphi-mac@RELAY.CS.NET
- X-VMS-To: @[.MAIL]DD
-
- Delphi Mac Digest Sunday, June 7, 1987 Volume 3 : Issue 30
-
- Today's Topics:
- Manuals (4 messages)
- NEC Multisyncs
- RE: Weird mouse tracking problem in Syst
- RE: BinHex 5.0 vs. BinHex 4.0
- re: Icons for non-APPL files
- re: MAC-II development environments
- re: Icon Quest
- re: New version WriteNow Translator DA
- re: PageMaker and ReadySetGo compared
- RE: New system/finder (3 messages)
- MacHack '87
- The Low down on LoDOWN...
- Fortran
- Fix for PL30 boot problems
- re: Mac SE 68020 Accelerator Cards???
- RE: Mac II Batteries?
- RE: Standardized "calls" (Again!)
- RE: System 4.1 Tornado Warning! (2 messages)
- FKey-0 ? (3 messages)
- Fuzzy SE Screen
- Mac II problems? (2 messages)
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: MACENGLISH
- Subject: Manuals
- Date: 25-MAY 21:09 Mousing Around
-
- I would like to get my hands on the tool to open my Mac and the repair
- manuals for the Mac and the Imagewriter I. We have this really neat man
- at school who repairs everything in sight (a genius, I think) for our
- school system. He repairs all the VCR's, TV's, and computers (if he has
- parts). In addition, he has fixed various pieces of stereo equipment of
- mine for free. Recently, he figured out what was wrong with my printer,
- and I ordered the appropriate part.
- However, if I can get the repair manuals, I'm sure he would be able to
- figure out what's wrong with my Mac whenever it starts acting up. He
- could tell me what part I needed and fix it, and then I wouldn't have to
- rely on inexperienced techies. He'd could also teach me all about the
- inside of my Mac as he fixes it.
-
- But how can I get ahold of the manuals and the tool? The dealer
- suggested that they weren't for sale to just anybody. Does any nice
- person out there have copies he wouldn't mind selling me?
-
- Debbie
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACINTOUCH
- Subject: RE: Manuals (Re: Msg 20204)
- Date: 26-MAY 10:29 Mousing Around
-
- Debbie,
-
- The tool is available from a number of sources (there's one which
- combines the Torx screwdriver and the opener lever). The instructions
- seem to be available only to authorized Apple dealers (who have service
- centers) and VARs (Levco, etc.).
-
- Ric
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: AESOP
- Subject: RE: Manuals (Re: Msg 20204)
- Date: 27-MAY 00:34 Mousing Around
-
- Debbie,
-
- They _aren't_ for sale to just anybody. _If_ you want to spring for the
- $$ to take an Apple course, you can qualify....but can you get an Apple
- dealer to be a sponsor?
-
- Circuit diagrams of Macintoshes have been circulated in various formats.
- I haven't seen anything of that nature recently, nor for the
- ImageWriters; if you ask me that is a mark of shame against Apple and a
- strike against those of us who let them get away without providing that
- information.
-
- Apple won't even let dealers _sell_ a computer unless their technicians
- and salepeople have qualified by taking the appropriate course for the
- machine. The claim is, the customer can only get proper service this
- way; if you ask me, this is one way to keep mail-order suppliers out and
- margins high.
-
- Laird
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACENGLISH
- Subject: RE: Manuals (Re: Msg 20246)
- Date: 28-MAY 19:20 Mousing Around
-
- How much is the course? Will I get the manuals as part of the course?
- How do I qualify and/ or sign up? I "might" be able to get a dealer to
- sponsor me, but does a dealer have to sponsor me? Could I be sponsored
- by anyone else?
-
- Debbie
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACINTOUCH
- Subject: NEC Multisyncs
- Date: 26-MAY 18:44 Hardware & Peripherals
-
- The NEC Multisync monitors are reported to work with the Mac II if you
- can hack a cable together to connect them. Priority 1 has one (800x560)
- for $599 (800-423-5922, Chatsworth, CA). ComputerWorld reports today
- that 2 new NEC Multisyncs are coming soon, and that NEC says they're
- shipping 50,000/month. The Multisync Plus will have 15" (diag.) screen,
- 55MHz, and 960x720 for $1399 list. The Multisync XL ("Plus" and "XL"?!)
- has a 20" screen, 65MHz, 1024x768 for $3195.
-
- Ric
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: PEABO
- Subject: RE: Weird mouse tracking problem in Syst (Re: Msg 20226)
- Date: 26-MAY 22:10 Network Digests
-
- >Date: Thu, 21 May 87 11:08:50 EDT
- >From: Mark Nodine <mnodine@labs-b.bbn.com>
- >Subject: Weird mouse tracking problem in System 4.1
-
- It does happen on System 3.2, though only on the 64K ROMs. The
- jittering in its original incarnation was caused by a bug in PinRect (so
- I've been told), and is visible both at the right hand edge and the
- bottom edge of the screen. Systems prior to 4.0 don't exhibit the
- problem on 128K ROMs.
-
- peter "In any context, half of all references
- PEABO @ DELPHI are local and half are global."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: PEABO
- Subject: RE: BinHex 5.0 vs. BinHex 4.0 (Re: Msg 20228)
- Date: 26-MAY 22:32 Network Digests
-
- >Date: Thu, 21 May 87 10:46 EST
- >From: Paul Christensen <PCHRISTENSEN%rca.com@RELAY.CS.NET>
- >Subject: BinHex 5.0 vs. BinHex 4.0
-
- >Yes, this is probably an old question, I realize, but I can't seem to find
- >the answer.
- ...
- >So my question is this...why was BinHex 5.0 released, and why should it be
- >used (other than to convert files that were created by it)?
-
- BinHex 5.0 was released in April 1985 in order to support the MacBinary
- standard which had just come into being. At the time there were no
- terminal programs which could do on-the-fly conversion of MacBinary
- format files into Mac files, so this allowed people to do the conversion
- as a separate step.
-
- Of course, it's not useful if your storage medium is based on 7-bit .HQX
- files or on MacGet/MacPut. However, you can use XMODEM or Kermit along
- with BinHex 5.0 to communicate with a host that uses Macinary (an 8-bit
- storage format).
-
- peter "In any context, half of all references
- PEABO @ DELPHI are local and half are global."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: DDUNHAM
- Subject: re: Icons for non-APPL files (Re: Msg 20227)
- Date: 28-MAY 00:48 Network Digests
-
- >From: HALLETT JEFFREY A <HALLETT@ge-crd.arpa>
- >Subject: Icons for non-APPL files
-
- Yes, give non-APPLs icons the same way, using 'INIT' instead of 'APPL'
- in the FREF. Remember that the Desktop never forgets, so if you make a
- mistake, it's hard to see your corrected version unless you clean out
- the Desktop (or, as recently happened to me, if you did it right the
- first time and then forgot to set the bundle bit and screwed up the
- FREF, you won't notice it, since the correct resources are still in
- Desktop).
-
- David Dunham "If voting could change the system, it would be illegal. If
- Maitreya Design not voting could change the system, it would be be illegal."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: DDUNHAM
- Subject: re: MAC-II development environments (Re: Msg 20227)
- Date: 28-MAY 00:48 Network Digests
-
- >From: <ucsbcsl!uncle@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
- >Subject: MAC-II development environemnts
-
- You can get a version of TMON to work on the II (in 1-bit color).
- LightspeedC works. Aztec C doesn't, but when I called Manx, they said
- it did (but weren't sure if they were using their new beta version --
- haven't called back yet).
-
- David Dunham "Efficiency is intelligent laziness."
- Maitreya Design
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: DDUNHAM
- Subject: re: Icon Quest (Re: Msg 20227)
- Date: 28-MAY 00:49 Network Digests
-
- >From: Josh Susser <Susser.pasa@Xerox.COM>
- >Subject: Icon Quest
-
- It's probably buried in SCSI Installer, since the driver is responsible
- for returning its own icon.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: DDUNHAM
- Subject: re: New version WriteNow Translator DA (Re: Msg 20228)
- Date: 28-MAY 00:50 Network Digests
-
- >From: BOLSON%UWALOCKE.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
- >Subject: New version WriteNow Translator DA
-
- Hi Ed, you figured out the problem with MacWrite format?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: DDUNHAM
- Subject: re: PageMaker and ReadySetGo compared (Re: Msg 20229)
- Date: 28-MAY 00:50 Network Digests
-
- >From: BOGARTZ%UMASS.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu
- >Subject: PageMaker and ReadySetGo compared
-
- PageMaker does _not_ have full Undo. Most annoyingly, you can't Undo
- typestyle changes!
-
-
- David Dunham "If it doesn't have Undo, it's not a Mac program."
- Maitreya Design
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: OSKINTOUCH
- Subject: RE: New system/finder (Re: Msg 20271)
- Date: 28-MAY 19:43 Hardware & Peripherals
-
- I've noted some bugs with LaserWriter 4.0 when printing with PowerPoint.
- My slides print fine but my notes and handouts pages leave out items
- from both pasted PICT images and Titles. Forethought says that there
- are bugs in Laserwriter driver 4.0 and that you should use 3.1. When I
- used 3.1 my problems disappeared.
-
- Any thoughts out there??
-
- Jonathan
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: CHUQ
- Subject: RE: New system/finder (Re: Msg 20290)
- Date: 28-MAY 23:53 Hardware & Peripherals
-
- I've also had problems with Laserwriter 4.0 and filemaker plus. it
- won't initialize the printer or print the first time properly -- afteer
- that, though, it works fine (a bitch to get started, though). Since
- that is the ONLY application affected by this that I have, I'm more
- tempted to believe they did something a bit off the standard and got
- byt.
-
- Ready Set Go 3! didn't work with LW3.3, but works fine again with 4.0,
- so it can't be the 3.3 bugs carried forward.
-
- chuq
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACINTOUCH
- Subject: RE: New system/finder (Re: Msg 20301)
- Date: 29-MAY 00:10 Hardware & Peripherals
-
- I'm having weird problems trying to print with FileMaker Plus on this
- system, to an ImageWriter I. I can't tell yet if it's the HyperCharger,
- the new System, MaxPrint, or FileMaker. :-(
-
- Ric
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACINTOUCH
- Subject: MacHack '87
- Date: 28-MAY 20:14 Programming
-
- Anyone going to MacHack '87?? Any ideas on whether it's going to be a
- big thing or not?
-
- Ric
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: INC
- Subject: The Low down on LoDOWN...
- Date: 29-MAY 16:31 Business Mac
-
- Well we've just purchased the LoDOWN scanner from ComputerWare and here
- are our first initial impressions.
-
- 1. The manual is suk-o-rama. We're talking a 15 page getting start
- with no extensive help of tips, etc. It assume knowledge of scanning,
- etc. Thank gd I do.
-
- 2. The software is bug-o-rama. When they finally get it to work, it'll
- be real sweet but with the bugs and printing problems (PostScript
- errors, unable to print, etc...) it becomes a real hassel. It also
- hangs at saving with PICT format. Let's hope they get working on it,
- and fast.
-
- 3. The hardware is real nice. Yes, the software part of this package
- doesn't cut the mustard but the hardware makes up for it. (Why do I
- feel like a MacWorld reviewer?) They have a BBS for software upgrades
- and am presently up to version 1.1 but would like to see a version,
- forgetting the number, that isn't a beta in release clothing.
-
-
- Hey, does any other software work on these scanners? It's the typical
- scanner with the cannon engine.
-
- thanks.
-
- Joshua
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: SJL
- Subject: Fortran
- Date: 29-MAY 21:28 Software Supplement
-
- I'm preparing to enter the world of translating IBM mainframe fortran VS
- to the MMac. The codes are power plant simulations and are each several
- thousand lines. I called DCM re:MacFortran 77 They said it started
- shipping Tues this week and has an integrated environment like I'm used
- to from Lightspeed. Any beta testers out there who would like to comment
- and compare to the only other choice (ie. Absoft fortran).
-
- Also are there any comments re: McFace for Absoft Fortran.
-
- Thanks for the feedback! Steve...
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: JONE
- Subject: Fix for PL30 boot problems
- Date: 30-MAY 01:31 Bugs & Features
-
- The problem was on the DOVE SCSI board. A call to Dove fixed the
- problem. A jumper had been left on the board which needed to be removed.
- Everything is fine now.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACINTOUCH
- Subject: re: Mac SE 68020 Accelerator Cards??? (Re: Msg 20331)
- Date: 30-MAY 10:06 Network Digests
-
- To: Tony Siegman <SIEGMAN@Sierra.Stanford.EDU> Subject: : Mac SE 68020
- Accelerator Cards???
-
- I'm using a HyperCharger 020 accelerator card. It seems to be of high
- quality with good software (cdev and INITs). I've heard that it won't
- be available from dealers for 3 weeks, although it seems completely
- finished in packaging, etc.
-
- The Radius has some nice attributes, discussed on CompuServe, including
- a static-RAM cache (no wait states), and some kind of video buffer to
- avoid slowing down the 68020 by making it do all the screen updating.
- Apparently the Mac Plus version of this will ship before the SE version,
- and the SE version is a few months off. The Radius seems to be the
- least expensive.
-
- The HyperCharger is claimed to be compatible with the BigScreen from
- EMachines, and the Radius is obviously compatible with the Radius board.
- I don't think either the Radius or HyperCharger has provisions for a
- 68851 for Unix.
-
- I don't know much about the Prodigy, except I'd expect it to be good
- given their experience. There's also an Orion board from Peak Systems
- in Texas which I know little about, though it's supposed to have a 68851
- socket.
-
- Ric Ford
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: VINDICATOR
- Subject: RE: Mac II Batteries? (Re: Msg 20155)
- Date: 30-MAY 11:46 Hardware & Peripherals
-
- I was at the Chicago area Mac developer's meeting a few days ago, and
- got the scoop on the Mac II batteries. Here's the deal: about two weeks
- ago, InfoWorld published a pre-review of a Mac II, which the guy loved.
- He's had the beast for about seven months, so the machine, keyboard, etc
- were all betas. The keyboard, from which you can power down the Mac, had
- an excessive loss and therefore drained the battery. Apple fixed the
- problem immediately. This guy has been, according to the Apple rep, the
- only person he knows who had the problem, and no one since. InforWorld,
- however, sees this mention of the battery problem, decides where there's
- smoke there must be fire, and changes one failed battery to "widespread
- failure of Mac II batteries." And that, apparently, is the story. I also
- asked the Apple guy why the batteries are soldered in the first place.
- The Mac II batteries are lithium batteries, and according to him are
- dangerous when they leak, so much so that if you tried to handle a leaky
- one you'd have to stop off at the hospital on the way to the computer
- store. In order to prevent loss of fingers, they're soldered. If this is
- the reason that they're soldered, it seems a pretty good one. However, I
- would have been more than happy with a normal battery ala PC AT (ie
- velcroed in, not soldered).
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: PEABO
- Subject: RE: Standardized "calls" (Again!) (Re: Msg 20331)
- Date: 30-MAY 14:21 Network Digests
-
- >Date: Tue, 26 May 87 12:09:24 pdt
- >From: mab@ads.ARPA (Mike Brzustowicz)
- >Subject: Re: Standardized "calls" (Again!)
-
- >I have in front of me a DEC manual for the TOPS-10 version of fortran,
- >basic and algol that describes such a standardized calling sequence.
- >It is dated 1967, which I believe predates IBM's 360. (DEC DID do
- >things before VMS).
-
- >Also remember that Burroughs had been using the concept of Virtual
- >Memory for fifteen (15) years when IBM announced a revolutionary new
- >concept in computation--you guessed it, Virtual Memory!
-
- The IBM 360 was announced in April 1964 and probably shipped early in
- 1965. To be fair however, it should be pointed out that the run-time
- support for the various IBM 360 languages did not mesh very well (unlike
- VMS). Speaking of Burroughs, the B5500 was a contemporary of the IBM
- 360, and the uniform stack architecture implemented in hardware forced a
- uniform calling standard on that machine!
-
- peter "In any context, half of all references
- PEABO @ DELPHI are local and half are global."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: MACINTOUCH
- Subject: RE: System 4.1 Tornado Warning! (Re: Msg 20364)
- Date: 30-MAY 18:07 Bugs & Features
-
- The previous message about problems with System 4.1/Finder 5.5 was
- misleading. The problem turns out to be the known *Mac II*
- incompatibility with MacWrite. The source claims that MacWrite 4.5,
- when run on a Mac II, may trash the hard disk when it crashes.
-
- Ric Ford
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: NAKMAN
- Subject: RE: System 4.1 Tornado Warning! (Re: Msg 20366)
- Date: 31-MAY 16:15 Bugs & Features
-
- Ric -
-
- Yeah, at AppleWorld Apple was showing a new MacWrite (4.6), that fixed
- that bug. The Levco Prodigy SE cdev has a radio button for "MacWrite
- Sniffer" - I guess it traps launches and looks to see if MacWrite is
- lurking, and then turns off the instruction cache or something.
-
- -- Raines
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: M_DELUGG
- Subject: FKey-0 ?
- Date: 31-MAY 17:11 Bugs & Features
-
- Hmmmm... Hi y'all,
-
- The current finder (5.5?) won't let me use FKEY-0. Is something corrupted in my
- Finder? or is this just a new feature? I can use it in any application I've
- tried so far. I've even tried re-numbering FKEYs (in order to put another
- function in that slot) but no go. I guess I'll re-copy a new Finder and see. Or
- maybe someone smarter about this stuff than I can tell me wha hoppen?
-
- Thanks! :-)
- - Mikey
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: BRECHER
- Subject: RE: FKey-0 ? (Re: Msg 20387)
- Date: 2-JUN-04:19: Bugs & Features
-
- Some program -- I forget which -- has an FKEY 0 version resource; version
- resources go into the Desktop file. When you press Cmd-Shift-0, the system
- loads the first FKEY 0 resource it finds, which is that program's version
- resource rather than the code you intended to be executed.
-
- You need to find that program, get rid of it, and then rebuild your Desktop.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: PEABO
- Subject: RE: FKey-0 ? (Re: Msg 20442)
- Date: 2-JUN-11:31: Bugs & Features
-
- Ugh. Not only get rid of the program, but get rid of the application signature
- in any Desktop it was on, if you intend to use FKEY 0 from Finder.
-
- (Just echoing your comment because you left the implication understated.)
-
- peter
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: OSKINTOUCH
- Subject: Fuzzy SE Screen
- Date: 1-JUN-19:37: Hardware & Peripherals
-
- I have been experiencing a general _fuzziness_ throughout various portions of
- my MacSE screen. The pixels seem to move around slightly in a jerky pattern.
- I was trying to relate it to disk access or some other variable but cannot
- correlate the symptom to anything in particular. (It is a 2-drive SE with
- a Hyper FX-20 running system 4.1/Finder 5.5.)
- Anyone have any ideas? Should I take it to the doctor....
- Thanks,
- Jonathan
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: ASYMET
- Subject: Mac II problems?
- Date: 2-JUN-00:38: Hardware & Peripherals
-
- Computerworld recently carried a lurid article which said that the early
- production Mac II's are eating hard disks, blowing up batteries and generally
- acting like IBM PC/AT's (though they didn't put it that way).
-
- Can anybody with a real (non-prototype) Mac II comment? Are they accurate,
- exaggerating, or lying outright? Has your machine treated you nicely?
-
- I'd like to get some trustworthy information on this, since my company is
- expecting a Mac II this month.
-
- Thanks!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: DWB
- Subject: RE: Mac II problems? (Re: Msg 20433)
- Date: 6-JUN-21:27: Hardware & Peripherals
-
- I've had a production mac (one of the first off the line) for about 1.5 months.
- I haven't had any problems with it. I might point out the problems reported
- with the InfoWorld Mac II chewing batteries in a hurry was found (the keyboard
- sucks power even when the II is turned off and it was sucking too much) and
- fixed long before it went into production.
-
- David
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Delphi Mac Digest
- ************************
-